Categories
Coffee review General Observations Science history Tea

Time standing still at VCR, Kuala Lumpur

VCR chalkboard
A trip down memory lane via a new cafe. VCR in Bangsar, KL

One of the first science-based talks I gave was about how VCR tapes worked. Depending on how you viewed it (and whether you had to listen), this was either an achievement given that I was at school and didn’t really understand magnetism nor magnetoresistive devices, or a thing to be suffered through (for much the same reasons). So when I learned that a new café called VCR had opened in Bangsar in Kuala Lumpur, it prompted a series of fond (and a few embarrassing) memories.

Moving on, it is clear that this second branch of VCR (the first is in Pudu, in the main part of KL), aims to provoke such memories of times past. From the name of the wifi to the pulleys behind the counter and the wooden screen at the back of the café, various details around the café pull your memory in different directions. However the coffee is very much in the present. With three types of coffee available to try as a pour over as well as the standard espresso based drinks, this café has a lot to offer. The coffee is roasted by VCR themselves in their Pudu branch. There is also an extensive food menu with an interesting Chawan mushi as well as an intricate avocado toast (topped with pomegranate seeds, toasted quinoa and feta).

coffee at VCR Bangsar
Coffee and pour over jug. But is the number 68 or 89?

The friendly baristas were happy to advise on which coffee to match with which brewing device (though there seemed a marked preference for V60s on the days I visited). In total I tried 4 pour-overs, one with the Kalita Wave and the others by V60. These coffees were all excellent but very different. A couple were fruity, one was sweet and full bodied, one reminded me a bit of the local fruit durian, not I hasten to add because of its taste, but because the aroma from the cup was so different from the flavour of the drink. It was a great privilege to be able to try these different coffees consecutively and to really experience the variety of flavours in coffee. Great care was taken while making the pour over before it was brought over to the table, together with a jug of water, it also seemed to me that the baristas kept a discreet eye on me afterwards to ensure I enjoyed the coffee. So it was a good experience to have had the opportunity both to enjoy one of those pour overs and to observe the people and the surroundings of VCR when I had to wait for 1 hour for someone with no phone and no book. If you get the opportunity to do this I would very much recommend it. Find a comfortable café, order a coffee and then sit, without distractions, and watch what your mind notices and where it wanders for an hour.

An obvious place for a mind to wander would be to the mechanism of tape recording (and why mini-disks are the superior recording medium for the elegance of the physics involved). However, in an hour a mind wanders far further than the name. Supporting the cakes (and a display case for the 2nd place award of the brewers cup), was a table with a concertina type decoration around its edge. Was this a nod to the Kalita Wave brewing device? This is a significant difference between the V60 and the Kalita Wave: the ridges (or wave pattern) on the filter of the latter. How does coffee flow past these ridges? Does this difference in flow dynamics make a difference to the taste of the coffee?

variables grind size, pour rate, pour vorticity
It seems that there would be a lot of physics to observe in the fluid flow in a Kalita Wave filter.

A few weeks previously a friend had made a (lovely) coffee with her Kalita Wave. It was interesting to note the different dose of coffee she used and the way the grinds built up in the ridges (compared with my ‘normal’ V60). Why do the grinds end up in the ridges? Why is there a layer of dust on the blades of a fan? Why do some corners of a building collect more dust or leaves than others? Are these questions related and does it change the flavour of the coffee in the Kalita?

In fact, there are many subtleties in understanding how fluids move around solid objects. One of these is that at the interface of the fluid with the solid, the fluid does not flow at all, there is a stationary layer. Known as a boundary layer or Prandtl boundary layer (after the person who first suggested their existence, Ludwig Prandtl), realising these layers existed revolutionised the field of aerodynamics. The problem had been how to model the drag experienced by a solid object in a fluid flow. Although perhaps only of academic interest in terms of the flow of coffee around a Kalita filter or a spoon, by the end of the nineteenth century and particularly, with the invention of airplanes, how to calculate fluid (i.e air) flow around a solid (i.e. wing) object became very important for practical reasons.

vortices, turbulence, coffee cup physics, coffee cup science
Another cool consequence of boundary layers:
Vortices created at the walls of a mug when the whole cup of coffee is placed on a rotating object (such as a record player).

Prandtl introduced the concept of a boundary layer in 1904. The idea allowed physicists to treat the main body of the moving fluid separately to the layer, very close to the solid, that was dominated by friction with the solid. This meant that the Navier-Stokes equations (that are used to describe fluid flow and ordinarily do not have an analytical solution) are simplified for this boundary layer and can be quantitatively solved. Although simple, by the 1920s Prandtl’s layer (and consequently the solvable equations) were being used to quantitatively predict the skin friction drag produced by airplanes and airships.

The boundary layer allows us to understand how vortices form behind cylinders or around the corners of buildings. I suspect a mix of the boundary layer, turbulence caused by the coffee going over many of the ridges and the brick like stacking/jamming of the coffee grains would combine to explain the difference in the grind shape around the Kalita Wave and the V60 filters. What this does to the flavour of the coffee and whether better brewing would involve more agitation, I will leave to Kalita Wave coffee lovers to investigate. And when you do, I would love to hear of your results, either here on Facebook or Twitter.

 

Categories
General Science history

A link between high blood pressure and drinking cold brew through a straw

Straws with viscous liquid (milkshake) in them
Drinking milkshake through a straw or two.

How do you drink your cold-brew? How about iced-coffee or iced-tea? Would you drink it through a straw? Maybe a smoothie or a milkshake would be ok. Perhaps you’ve noticed that you need a large straw to drink that milkshake while a small straw works for ‘thinner’ drinks. But what is the connection between this and the measurement of your blood pressure? It is not that drinking coffee gives you high blood pressure or the reverse. That question can be left for discussion on other websites. No, the question is, can drinking a milkshake through a straw give you an insight into the problems of high blood pressure caused by the build up of cholesterol?

If you are currently in a café, why not try an experiment. Get two straws and try drinking a cold drink using both of them together. It’s tricky but it is do-able, you can drink your drink. Now place one straw such that it is ‘sucking’ on the air outside the glass with the other straw still in the drink. Without cheating you can no longer ‘suck’ up that cold brew. Plugging either end of the ‘free to air’ straw enables you once again to drink your coffee. This experiment demonstrates that you are not really ‘sucking’ the liquid through the straw, rather you are generating a pressure difference between the top of the straw (a lower pressure in your mouth) and atmospheric pressure (higher pressure, around the drink) that pushes the liquid through the straw. Attempting to drink through two straws when one is open to the atmosphere cancels out that pressure difference.

2 straws
The straw on the left has a diameter of 3mm, on the right, 6mm.

Now another experiment. How do straws of different diameters affect the amount of liquid you can ‘pull’ through the straw? Try it. I have two straws in this picture, the smaller one has a diameter of 3mm, the larger one a diameter of 6mm. It takes a lot longer to drink a quantity of liquid through the smaller straw than it does the larger straw (assuming that you are drinking the same drink with each straw). For example, I drank 200ml of water in 10-12 sec with the larger straw but 26 sec with the smaller straw.

Back in the early nineteenth century two people were each investigating how liquid flowed through narrow tubes. Jean Leonard Marie Poiseuille (1797-1869) was investigating tubes of diameter 0.013-0.65mm in order to understand the flow of blood through capillaries in the body. Gotthilf Heinrich Ludwig Hagen (1797-1884) was investigating tubes between 2.3-6mm diameter (the same as the straws in the picture). Although they came to their conclusions independently, their work now forms the basis of parts of our understanding of the circulation of blood in the body†. What is now known as the Hagen-Poiseuille law states that the flow of liquid through the straw (or blood vessel) is proportional to the pressure difference between the two ends of the straw (how much you ‘suck’ so to speak) and the radius of the straw raised to the fourth power*. That is, it is the radius x radius x radius x radius. Doubling the radius of the straw results in a 2x2x2x2 (= 16) increase in flow rate.

Experimenting with the two straws does not give you quite the 16x difference that you may expect from this law perhaps partly because the flow into the straw is turbulent. If you maintained a uniform flow through the straws, you should find that the difference in flow rate between the two straws would be closer to 16x.

straw, water, glass, refraction
A straw in water, another physics-phenomenon that is worth contemplating for a while.

Of course, what applies to straws applies equally well to arteries or even the alveoli in your lungs. If your arteries get clogged by too much cholesterol, the reduction in the diameter of the artery leads to a reduced flow of the blood. A decrease in the diameter of an artery by just twenty percent more than halves the flow rate of blood through it (thereby increasing the blood pressure required to maintain ‘normal’ flow rate). Similarly the constriction of the alveoli in the lungs of asthmatics reduces the flow rate of air through the lungs in an asthma attack.

So it is not quite the fact that drinking cold-brew through a thin straw can give you high blood pressure. It is rather that thinking about how liquid moves through straws can help you to think about what is going on in your body. Those arteries of yours may be worth thinking about as you sip your cold brew this summer, whether or not you do so through a straw.

 

*The Hagen-Poiseuille law states that the flow rate F = ΔP.(r²)²/(8ηl) where ΔP is the pressure difference, r the radius of the straw, η is the viscosity of the liquid and l the length of the straw (or artery). Perhaps you can see why you will need a larger diameter straw to drink a milkshake.

†Blood Pressure Measurement, An Illustrated History by NH. Naqvi and MD Blaufox, Parthenon Publishing (1998)